- Trichoderma harzianumPositive and negative results8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- copper atomPositive and negative results6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- Copper hydroxidePositive and negative results5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- carbendazimPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- chitosanPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- salicylic acidPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- Allium sativumPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- emamectin benzoatePositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- metribuzinPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- PebulatePositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- diethofencarbPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- pyrimethanilPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- tea tree oilPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- Bacillus subtilisResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- acibenzolar-S-methylResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- mancozebResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Azadirachta indicaResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Funneliformis mosseaeResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Halosulfuron-methylResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- TrichodermaResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- abamectinResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- allyl isothiocyanateResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- avermectinResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- fomesafenResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- imidaclopridResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- profenofosResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- rimsulfuronResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- uniconazoleResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Bacillus cereusResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Oryza sativaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Penicillium oxalicumResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- PseudomonasResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Pseudomonas aeruginosaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Pseudomonas fluorescensResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Purpureocillium lilacinumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Trichoderma virideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- acetic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- bifenthrinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- boscalidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- bromomethaneResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- cypermethrinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- dazometResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- diafenthiuronResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- dimethoateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- ethyl acetateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- eugenolResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- hydrochlorideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- metolachlorResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- paclobutrazolResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- spinosadResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.