- fertilizationPositive and negative results23 papers: 18 positive, 5 negative or no effect
- nitrogenPositive and negative results15 papers: 10 positive, 5 negative or no effect
- irrigationPositive and negative results11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- biocharPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- botanicalPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- applicationResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- otherResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- phosphorusResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- co2Results agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- graftingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- mulchingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- mycorrhizaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- nanoparticleResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.