Physiology: hormones · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)

78 questions: every treatment tested on this organism for this target by at least two papers.

  1. chitosanResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  2. salicylic acidResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  3. 24-epi-brassinolideResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  4. silicon atomResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  5. 5-aminolevulinic acidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  6. acibenzolar-S-methylResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  7. Aloe veraResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  8. Botrytis cinereaResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  9. Funneliformis mosseaeResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  10. Meloidogyne javanicaResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  11. S-nitrosoglutathioneResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  12. acetic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  13. brassinolideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  14. copper atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  15. ethanolResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  16. galactoseResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  17. indole-3-acetic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  18. iron atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  19. magnesium(2+)Results agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  20. propeneResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  21. putrescineResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  22. silver(1+) nitrateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  23. titanium dioxideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  24. nanoparticleResults agree9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  25. applicationResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  26. mycorrhizaResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  27. graftingResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  28. botanicalResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  29. salinityResults agree4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect
  30. seed treatmentResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  31. transgenicResults agree4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect
  32. biocharResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  33. phosphorusResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  34. pruningResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  35. resistance inducerResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.