- (+)-abscisic acidPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- poly(ethylene)Results agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Aloe veraResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Oryza sativaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Pontederia crassipesResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- cadmium atomResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- hydrogen peroxideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- sodium chlorideResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- trap barrierResults differ10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
- shadeResults differ9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect · 3 pairs of papers confirmed to differ
- mulchingPositive and negative results31 papers: 29 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- fertilizationPositive and negative results20 papers: 19 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- irrigationPositive and negative results18 papers: 13 positive, 5 negative or no effect
- cultivation systemPositive and negative results8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- applicationPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- coldPositive and negative results5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect
- inoculationPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- floodingPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- mycorrhizaPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- otherResults agree9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- processingResults agree9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- storageResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- biocharResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- growing mediumResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- organicResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- salinityResults agree6 papers: 0 positive, 6 negative or no effect
- heatResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- tillageResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- graftingResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- humidityResults agree4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect
- nanoparticleResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- botanicalResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- droughtResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- lightResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- radiationResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- solarizationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- stageResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- transplantingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.