Tolerance: abiotic · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)

1. sodium chlorideResults differ6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect · 2 pairs of papers confirmed to differ
2. (+)-abscisic acidPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. hydrogen peroxidePositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
4. melatoninPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
5. calcium atomPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
6. nitric oxidePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
7. glycine betaineResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. salicylic acidResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. Gibberellic acidResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. spermidineResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. (-)-methyl jasmonateResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. L-ascorbic acidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. sodium nitroprussideResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. trehaloseResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. 1-aminocyclopropanecarboxylic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. etheneResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
17. synthetic strigolactoneResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. loss of functionPositive and negative results53 papers: 12 positive, 41 negative or no effect
19. applicationPositive and negative results8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect
20. salinityPositive and negative results8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect
21. graftingPositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
22. overexpressionPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
23. transgenicPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
24. classPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
25. processingPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
26. potassiumPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
27. inoculationResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
28. seed treatmentResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
29. heatResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
30. mycorrhizaResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
31. otherResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
32. biocharResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
33. coldResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
34. botanicalResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
35. nanoparticleResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.