mycorrhiza · Rhizophagus intraradices · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)

Positive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 claims from these papers.

Papers here report positive and negative or no-effect results. No pair of them has been accepted in the claim-by-claim check.

How these papers cite each other

None of these papers cites another one here.

Positive resultNegative result or no effect20022004200620082010201220142016
  • Positive result
  • Negative result or no effect
  • Citation, pointing to the cited paper
  • Citation across the two sides
  • Larger circle: more citations overall

Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.

Papers reporting a positive result 3

  1. Effects of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Inoculation and Cattle Manure on Cadmium Uptake by Tobacco · 2012

  2. Effect of NPK Fertilizers and Co-inoculation with Phosphate-Solubilizing Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungus and Potassium-Mobilizing Bacteria on Growth, Yield, Nutrient Acquisition, and Quality of Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacumL.) · 2016

  3. Alleviatory Activities in Mycorrhizal Tobacco Plants Subjected to Increasing Chloride in Irrigation Water · 2016

Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 1

  1. Hormone concentrations in tobacco roots change during arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization with Glomus intraradices* · 2002

A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.

mycorrhiza on Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco) against other targets

mycorrhiza · Rhizophagus intraradices on other organisms