Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK with AMF and KMB improved tobacco leaf quality.

Treatment
chemical fertilizer in combination with both AMF and KMB strainse0
Interactor
Glomus intraradicesRhizophagus intraradicese2symbiont
Second interactor
Frateuria aurantiaFrateuria aurantiae2symbiont
Outcome
leaf quality parameterse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of chemical fertilizer in combination with both AMF and KMB strains consistently increased availability of P and K in the soil, improved leaf quality parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–963
e1

“leaf quality in tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–603
e2

“Glomus intraradices, and potassium-mobilizing bacterium (KMB), Frateuria aurantia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–214

Title

Effect of NPK Fertilizers and Co-inoculation with Phosphate-Solubilizing Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungus and Potassium-Mobilizing Bacteria on Growth, Yield, Nutrient Acquisition, and Quality of Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacumL.)

D. V. Subhashini Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 2016. doi:10.1080/00103624.2015.1123724

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-ec07d5eee5fd4f87aedadba6fe12c14f9b4414b84fb8fce66cbf2be89cc6c37c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

mycorrhiza · Rhizophagus intraradices · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

fertilization · Rhizophagus intraradices · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.