Crop injury · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)

1. sulfentrazonePositive and negative results6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect
2. clomazonePositive and negative results5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect
3. acibenzolar-S-methylPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
4. benfluralinPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
5. DiphenamidPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
6. sulfur dioxideResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
7. (-)-methyl jasmonateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. EPTCResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
9. benomylResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. electronResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. fomesafenResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
12. glyphosateResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
13. metolachlorResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
14. pendimethalinResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
15. sodium azideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. ozonePositive and negative results9 papers: 1 positive, 8 negative or no effect
17. botanicalPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
18. herbicidePositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
19. mechanicalPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
20. applicationPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
21. inoculationPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
22. solarizationPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
23. heatResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
24. phResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.