- AgrobacteriumPositive and negative results5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect
- ArabidopsisPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- Solanum tuberosumPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- PhytophthoraResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- amino acidResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- fusicoccinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- transgenicPositive and negative results42 papers: 14 positive, 28 negative or no effect
- loss of functionPositive and negative results33 papers: 9 positive, 24 negative or no effect
- pathogen productPositive and negative results12 papers: 4 positive, 8 negative or no effect
- overexpressionPositive and negative results6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- infectionPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.