- chlorantraniliprolePositive and negative results32 papers: 31 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- flubendiamidePositive and negative results19 papers: 18 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- indoxacarbPositive and negative results16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- Bacillus thuringiensisPositive and negative results10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- Beauveria bassianaPositive and negative results10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- Azadirachta indicaPositive and negative results8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- azadirachtinPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- emamectin benzoateResults agree45 papers: 45 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- spinosadResults agree45 papers: 45 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- cypermethrinResults agree15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- endosulfanResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Metarhizium anisopliaeResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- imidaclopridResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- novaluronResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- pheromoneResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- carbarylResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- fenvalerateResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Allium sativumResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- SpinetoramResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- abamectinResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- lambda-cyhalothrinResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Akanthomyces lecaniiResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- acephateResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- carbosulfanResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- cartapResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- chlorpyrifosResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- cyantraniliproleResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- hydrochlorideResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- malathionResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- thiamethoxamResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- tracerResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Acorus calamusResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Bacillus thuringiensis serovar kurstakiResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Carica papayaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Cymbopogon citratusResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Ricinus communisResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Trichogramma chilonisResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- deltamethrinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- dimethoateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- lufenuronResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- sulfur atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- triazophosResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- botanicalPositive and negative results31 papers: 28 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- applicationPositive and negative results18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- biocontrolPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- fertilizationPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- transplantingPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- densityPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- trap barrierResults agree15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- ipmResults agree11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.