- azadirachtinPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- buprofezinPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- carbofuranResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- 24-epi-brassinolideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- flubendiamideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- imidaclopridResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- malathionResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- mancozebResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- piperonyl butoxideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- spinosadResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- spirotetramatResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- botanicalPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- insecticideResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- applicationResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- fertilizationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.