Physiology: oxidative · Solanum melongena (eggplant)

20 questions: every treatment tested on this organism for this target by at least two papers.

  1. calcium atomPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  2. hydrogen peroxidePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  3. 24-epi-brassinolideResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  4. salicylic acidResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  5. sodium chlorideResults agree4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect
  6. calcium(2+)Results agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  7. melatoninResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  8. sodium nitroprussideResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  9. hydrogen sulfideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  10. coldPositive and negative results4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  11. irrigationPositive and negative results4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  12. infectionPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  13. heatPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  14. nanoparticlePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  15. salinityResults agree10 papers: 0 positive, 10 negative or no effect
  16. graftingResults agree9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  17. applicationResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  18. droughtResults agree4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect
  19. inoculationResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  20. seed treatmentResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.