Potato virus Y · Solanum tuberosum (potato)

1. salicylic acidPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. Rhizophagus intraradicesPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. Bacillus subtilisResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. ribavirinResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. double-stranded RNAResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. hydrogen peroxideResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. ascorbic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. carrageenanResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. chitosanResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. organicResults differ2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
11. infectionPositive and negative results15 papers: 3 positive, 12 negative or no effect
12. inoculationPositive and negative results6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect
13. loss of functionPositive and negative results5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect
14. insecticidePositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
15. intercroppingPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
16. mycorrhizaPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
17. nitrogenPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
18. applicationResults agree9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect
19. nanoparticleResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
20. botanicalResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
21. mulchingResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
22. in vitroResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
23. trap barrierResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.