Globodera pallida · Solanum tuberosum (potato)

1. oxamylPositive and negative results10 papers: 6 positive, 4 negative or no effect
2. Hordeum vulgarePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. Solanum sisymbriifoliumResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. aldicarbResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. Agrobacterium radiobacterResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. Brassica junceaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. lipopolysaccharideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. mycorrhizaPositive and negative results5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect
9. inoculationPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
10. allelopathyPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
11. cover cropPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
12. droughtPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
13. insecticideResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. botanicalResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. applicationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. loss of functionResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.