Bacillus thuringiensis · Phytophthora infestans · Solanum tuberosum (potato)
6 claims from these papers.
Papers whose results differ, checked claim by claim 1
1 pair of papers on this question report results that differ: an effect in one paper, the opposite effect or no effect in the other. Two model reviewers reading both claims accepted each pair.
Each paper in the lists below is placed by all its claims here taken together, positive if any claim is positive. A pair compares one claim of each paper, so a paper placed on the positive side can also report a decrease or no effect.
- The influence of co-treatment with Bacillus thuringiensis B-5351 and salicylic acid on the resistance of potato plants to Phytophthora infestans (Mont.) de Bary (2021)
no changeBacteria alone did not decrease the area of late blight symptoms on potato leaves.
Effect of Bacillus Bacteria on Hydrogen Peroxide Content and Gene Expression of Hydrolase Inhibitors in Potato Plants Infected with Phytophthora infestans (Mont.) de Bary (2021)decreaseB. thuringiensis reduced late blight severity in potato leaves with strain dependent effect.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers →
Papers reporting a positive result 2
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- no effect
- positive
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.