Phytophthora infestans · Solanum tuberosum (potato)

1. Bacillus thuringiensisResults differ2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
2. mancozebPositive and negative results23 papers: 20 positive, 3 negative or no effect
3. dimethomorphPositive and negative results17 papers: 15 positive, 2 negative or no effect
4. salicylic acidPositive and negative results12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect
5. cymoxanilPositive and negative results10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect
6. chlorothalonilPositive and negative results8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect
7. fenamidonePositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
8. TrichodermaPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
9. metalaxylPositive and negative results6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect
10. copper atomPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
11. Propamocarb hydrochloridePositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
12. fosetyl-AlPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
13. arachidonic acidPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
14. boron atomPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
15. chlorogenic acidPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
16. Bacillus subtilisResults agree14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. jasmonic acidResults agree9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. Trichoderma virideResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
19. Allium sativumResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
20. chitosanResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
21. double-stranded RNAResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
22. mandipropamidResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
23. Pseudomonas fluorescensResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
24. Trichoderma asperellumResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
25. Trichoderma harzianumResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
26. ametoctradinResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
27. cyazofamidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
28. famoxadoneResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
29. fluazinamResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
30. metiramResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
31. silver atomResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
32. ArabidopsisResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
33. Azadirachta indicaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
34. Bacillus velezensisResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
35. adjuvantResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
36. azoxystrobinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
37. benthiavalicarbResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
38. benthiavalicarb-isopropylResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
39. calcium chloride dihydrateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
40. ethaboxamResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
41. glucanResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
42. metaboliteResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
43. oxathiapiprolinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
44. scopolamineResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
45. silicon dioxide nanoparticleResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
46. zoxamideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
47. fungicidePositive and negative results40 papers: 32 positive, 8 negative or no effect
48. inoculationPositive and negative results40 papers: 24 positive, 16 negative or no effect
49. applicationPositive and negative results35 papers: 32 positive, 3 negative or no effect
50. loss of functionPositive and negative results31 papers: 16 positive, 15 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.