Fusarium · Solanum tuberosum (potato)

1. Aspergillus nigerResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
2. Aspergillus flavusResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. Penicillium chrysogenumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. Penicillium polonicumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. chitosanResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. inoculationPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
7. otherPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
8. solarizationResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. botanicalResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. applicationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. fertilizationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.