Leptinotarsa decemlineata · Solanum tuberosum (potato)

1. Bacillus thuringiensisPositive and negative results9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect
2. Tanacetum partheniumPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
3. Edovum puttleriPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
4. imidaclopridResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. Bacillus subtilisResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. Bacillus thuringiensis serovar tenebrionisResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. platinum(0)Results agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. spinosadResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. Azadirachta indicaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. Humulus lupulusResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. SpinetoramResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. Syringa vulgarisResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
13. aldicarbResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. carbofuranResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. cryoliteResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. dicofolResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. esfenvalerateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. fenvalerateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
19. limonoidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
20. oxamylResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
21. pymetrozineResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
22. silicon dioxideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
23. mulchingResults differ4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
24. botanicalPositive and negative results20 papers: 15 positive, 5 negative or no effect
25. insecticidePositive and negative results16 papers: 14 positive, 2 negative or no effect
26. applicationPositive and negative results10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect
27. fertilizationPositive and negative results6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect
28. transgenicPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
29. trap barrierPositive and negative results5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect
30. infectionPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
31. pruningPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
32. cultivation systemPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
33. fungicidePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
34. biocontrolResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
35. climate siteResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
36. inoculationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
37. lightResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
38. organicResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
39. rainfallResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
40. rotationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.