- mancozebPositive and negative results15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- metribuzinPositive and negative results10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- dimethomorphPositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- fluazinamPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- parathionPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- chitosanPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- glyphosatePositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- metalaxylPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- metalaxyl-MPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- aldrinPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- copper atomPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- dieldrinPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- silver atomPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- rimsulfuronResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Bacillus subtilisResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- fluopicolideResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- azoxystrobinResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- cymoxanilResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- phorateResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Azadirachta indicaResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- TrichodermaResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- boric acidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- carbendazimResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- chlorpyrifosResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- mandipropamidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- propinebResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Curcuma longaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- EPTCResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- MatrineResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Origanum vulgareResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Trichoderma virideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- aldicarbResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- cyantraniliproleResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- cyazofamidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- fludioxonilResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- jasmonic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- mercury dichlorideResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- metam-sodiumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- oxadixylResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- salicylic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- applicationPositive and negative results25 papers: 19 positive, 6 negative or no effect
- fungicidePositive and negative results23 papers: 16 positive, 7 negative or no effect
- inoculationPositive and negative results10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- insecticidePositive and negative results10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- fertilizationPositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- herbicidePositive and negative results6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- biocontrolPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- radiationPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- rotationPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- nanoparticlePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.