Molecular: metabolites · Solanum tuberosum (potato)

91 questions: every treatment tested on this organism for this target by at least two papers.

  1. sulfur atomResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  2. (-)-methyl jasmonateResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  3. 24-epi-brassinolideResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  4. arachidonic acidResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  5. chitosanResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  6. salicylic acidResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  7. adjuvantResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  8. cycloheximideResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  9. glyphosateResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  10. jasmonic acidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  11. melatoninResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  12. (2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  13. Bacillus subtilisResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  14. Rhizoctonia solaniResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  15. amino acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  16. ascorbateResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  17. caffeic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  18. chloramphenicolResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  19. diiodineResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  20. etheneResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  21. methanolResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  22. salicylhydroxamic acidResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  23. silicate(4-)Results agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  24. spinosadResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  25. fungicideResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  26. nanoparticleResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  27. rotationResults agree4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect
  28. co2Results agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  29. insecticideResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  30. physical treatmentResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  31. resistance inducerResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  32. trap barrierResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  33. uvResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  34. cultivation systemResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  35. ipmResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  36. mycorrhizaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  37. propertyResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.