- manganese atomPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- chitosanResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- hexaconazoleResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- lead atomResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- sulfur atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- fertilizationPositive and negative results33 papers: 28 positive, 5 negative or no effect
- nitrogenPositive and negative results9 papers: 5 positive, 4 negative or no effect
- potassiumPositive and negative results8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- applicationPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- otherPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- inoculationResults agree10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- biocharResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- limeResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- mycorrhizaResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- organicResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- salinityResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- tillageResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.