Molecular: metabolites · Olea europaea (common olive)

1. boron atomPositive and negative results5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect
2. sodium chloridePositive and negative results5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect
3. manganese atomPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
4. paclobutrazolPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
5. (+)-abscisic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. Azotobacter chroococcumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. chitosanResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. glyphosateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. indole-3-acetic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. silicon atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. applicationPositive and negative results12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect
12. droughtPositive and negative results8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect
13. fertilizationPositive and negative results8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect
14. irrigationPositive and negative results8 papers: 3 positive, 5 negative or no effect
15. salinityPositive and negative results7 papers: 1 positive, 6 negative or no effect
16. botanicalPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
17. otherPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
18. infectionPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
19. inoculationResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
20. mycorrhizaResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
21. processingResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
22. biocharResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
23. potassiumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.