Nutrient: content · Olea europaea (common olive)

1. boron atomPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. manganese atomPositive and negative results5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect
3. Rhizophagus intraradicesPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
4. silicon atomPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
5. fertilizationPositive and negative results35 papers: 28 positive, 7 negative or no effect
6. inoculationPositive and negative results11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect
7. mycorrhizaPositive and negative results10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect
8. otherPositive and negative results10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect
9. irrigationPositive and negative results7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect
10. nitrogenPositive and negative results6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect
11. droughtPositive and negative results4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect
12. ozonePositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
13. potassiumPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.