paclobutrazol · Phenology · Olea europaea (common olive)
4 claims from these papers.
Papers whose results differ, checked claim by claim 3
3 pairs of papers on this question report results that differ: an effect in one paper, the opposite effect or no effect in the other. Two model reviewers reading both claims accepted each pair.
- Flowering and vegetative growth of olive tree submitted to pruning and paclobutrazol application (2011)
no changePaclobutrazol concentrations did not affect olive flowering.
Effect of growth retardants on growth, flowering and physiological characteristics of olive cultivar Leccino under rain-fed conditions of Himachal Pradesh, India (2016)increaseNovember soil drenching with PP333 at 4 g a.i tree-1 increased olive flowering intensity to 0.65 %.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers → - The Time of Floral Induction in the Olive (1992)
no changePaclobutrazol injections between May and September did not affect next-year flowering.
Effect of growth retardants on growth, flowering and physiological characteristics of olive cultivar Leccino under rain-fed conditions of Himachal Pradesh, India (2016)increaseNovember soil drenching with PP333 at 4 g a.i tree-1 increased olive flowering intensity to 0.65 %.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers → - Effect of growth retardants on growth, flowering and physiological characteristics of olive cultivar Leccino under rain-fed conditions of Himachal Pradesh, India (2016)
increaseNovember soil drenching with PP333 at 4 g a.i tree-1 increased olive flowering intensity to 0.65 %.
Effect of different levels of paclobutrazol on vegetative growth of olive (Olea europaea L.) tree under subtropical climates (2017)no changeThe author found no PBZ influence on olive flowering, possibly because of plant immaturity or climate.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers →
How these papers cite each other
None of these papers cites another one here.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 1
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 3
The Time of Floral Induction in the Olive · 1992
- no effect
Flowering and vegetative growth of olive tree submitted to pruning and paclobutrazol application · 2011
- no effect
- no effect
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.