Phenology · Olea europaea (common olive)

1. paclobutrazolResults differ4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect · 3 pairs of papers confirmed to differ
2. (+)-abscisic acidResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
3. DaminozideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. Gibberellic acidResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
5. iron atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. applicationPositive and negative results8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect
7. irrigationPositive and negative results8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect
8. coldPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
9. nitrogenPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
10. fertilizationResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. pruningResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. droughtResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
13. nanoparticleResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. otherResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. potassiumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.