- kaolinResults differ2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
- Gibberellic acidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- salicylic acidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- boric acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- boron atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- cadmium atomResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- zinc atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- fertilizationPositive and negative results17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- applicationPositive and negative results13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- salinityPositive and negative results8 papers: 2 positive, 6 negative or no effect
- droughtPositive and negative results7 papers: 1 positive, 6 negative or no effect
- irrigationPositive and negative results5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- nitrogenPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- otherResults agree9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- botanicalResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.