Quality: sugar starch · Olea europaea (common olive)

1. boric acidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
2. Azotobacter chroococcumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. pruningPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
4. inoculationPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
5. applicationResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. fertilizationResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. otherResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. irrigationResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
9. botanicalResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. infectionResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
11. salinityResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
12. storageResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.