Nutrient: content · Sesamum indicum (sesame)

1. sulfur atomResults agree13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect
2. zinc sulfateResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. zinc atomResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. boron atomResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. manganese(II) sulfateResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. AzotobacterResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. manganese atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. fertilizationPositive and negative results44 papers: 43 positive, 1 negative or no effect
9. nitrogenPositive and negative results11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect
10. inoculationPositive and negative results10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect
11. phosphorusPositive and negative results9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect
12. irrigationPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
13. potassiumPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
14. radiationPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
15. applicationResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. limeResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. mycorrhizaResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. otherResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
19. salinityResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
20. cultivation systemResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
21. densityResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
22. droughtResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
23. tillageResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
24. transplantingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.