- sulfur atomResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Eleusine coracanaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- iron atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- zinc atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- fertilizationPositive and negative results17 papers: 15 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- irrigationPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- applicationPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- densityPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- nitrogenResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- droughtResults agree4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect
- inoculationResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- otherResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- phosphorusResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.