Nutrient: content · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)

1. sulfur atomPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. zinc atomPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. boron atomPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
4. iron atomResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. zinc sulfateResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. AzospirillumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. manganese atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. fertilizationPositive and negative results17 papers: 15 positive, 2 negative or no effect
9. applicationResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. inoculationResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. salinityResults agree4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect
12. droughtResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
13. nanoparticleResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. potassiumResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. biocharResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. heavy metalResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
17. mycorrhizaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. nitrogenResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
19. otherResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.