- Gibberellic acidResults differ4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect · 2 pairs of papers confirmed to differ
- AzotobacterPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- zinc atomResults agree17 papers: 17 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- sulfur atomResults agree9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- zinc sulfateResults agree9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- iron atomResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- thiamethoxamResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Trichoderma harzianumResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- dimethoateResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- chlormequat chlorideResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- elemental sulfurResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- manganese atomResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- AzospirillumResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Gossypium hirsutumResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- acetamipridResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- carbendazimResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- salicylic acidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- (1->4)-beta-D-glucanResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Azospirillum brasilenseResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Cicer arietinumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Glycine maxResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Oryza sativaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Pseudomonas putidaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Vigna mungoResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Vigna radiata var. radiataResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- ammonium sulfateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- arsenic atomResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- biomacromoleculeResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- boron atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- hydrogen peroxideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- imidaclopridResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- kinetinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- potassium permanganateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- potassium sulfateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- putrescineResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- silicate(4-)Results agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- sulfateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- fertilizationResults differ72 papers: 71 positive, 1 negative or no effect · 3 pairs of papers confirmed to differ
- nitrogenResults differ41 papers: 36 positive, 5 negative or no effect · 2 pairs of papers confirmed to differ
- droughtResults differ30 papers: 7 positive, 23 negative or no effect · 2 pairs of papers confirmed to differ
- irrigationPositive and negative results53 papers: 39 positive, 14 negative or no effect
- applicationPositive and negative results38 papers: 37 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- sowing timePositive and negative results34 papers: 24 positive, 10 negative or no effect
- densityPositive and negative results28 papers: 25 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- stagePositive and negative results19 papers: 12 positive, 7 negative or no effect
- inoculationPositive and negative results15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- tillagePositive and negative results14 papers: 12 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- salinityPositive and negative results11 papers: 1 positive, 10 negative or no effect
- intercroppingPositive and negative results9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- seed treatmentPositive and negative results9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.