Yield · Prunus avium (sweet cherry)

1. paclobutrazolResults differ8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect · 3 pairs of papers confirmed to differ
2. calcium atomResults differ5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
3. ammonium thiosulfateResults differ3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect · 2 pairs of papers confirmed to differ
4. Gibberellic acidPositive and negative results13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect
5. boron atomPositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
6. (+)-abscisic acidPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
7. 2-chloroethyl groupPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
8. DaminozidePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
9. Prunus mahalebPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
10. boric acidPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
11. calcium chloride dihydratePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
12. phosphonic acidPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
13. 1-naphthaleneacetic acidResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. (2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acidResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. putrescineResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. zinc atomResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. 2-naphthyloxyacetic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. N-benzyladenineResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
19. cyclanilideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
20. salicylic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
21. pruningResults differ21 papers: 14 positive, 7 negative or no effect · 2 pairs of papers confirmed to differ
22. applicationPositive and negative results19 papers: 11 positive, 8 negative or no effect
23. irrigationPositive and negative results18 papers: 9 positive, 9 negative or no effect
24. fertilizationPositive and negative results12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect
25. nitrogenPositive and negative results9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect
26. pollinationPositive and negative results8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect
27. classPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
28. processingPositive and negative results4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect
29. storagePositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
30. in vitroPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
31. stagePositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
32. infectionPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
33. loss of functionPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
34. phosphorusPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
35. graftingResults agree12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect
36. mulchingResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
37. otherResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
38. inoculationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
39. cultivation systemResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
40. organicResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
41. potassiumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.