Macrophomina phaseolina · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)

1. Bacillus subtilisResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
2. Trichoderma virideResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. AzotobacterResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. TrichodermaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. fertilizationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. seed treatmentResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. applicationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. biocharResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. mycorrhizaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.