- zinc atomPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- salicylic acidResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Gibberellic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- ascorbic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- cadmium atomResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- gamma-aminobutyric acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- silicon atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- droughtPositive and negative results9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- applicationPositive and negative results7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- lightPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- heavy metalResults agree6 papers: 0 positive, 6 negative or no effect
- biocharResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- fertilizationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- nitrogenResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- otherResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- botanicalResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- inoculationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- phosphorusResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- seed treatmentResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.