- sulfur atomResults agree10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- AzotobacterResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- boron atomResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- zinc atomResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- iron(2+) sulfate (anhydrous)Results agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- paclobutrazolResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- fertilizationPositive and negative results10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- nitrogenPositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- irrigationPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- herbicidePositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- biocharPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- applicationResults agree9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- phosphorusResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- tillageResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- densityResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- inoculationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- potassiumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- stageResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.