Yield · Helianthus tuberosus (Jerusalem artichoke)

1. Zea mays subsp. maysResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
2. magnesium atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. salicylic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. fertilizationPositive and negative results13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect
5. irrigationPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
6. droughtPositive and negative results4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect
7. densityPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
8. intercroppingPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
9. pruningPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
10. applicationResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. nitrogenResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. potassiumResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. inoculationResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. otherResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. mycorrhizaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. radiationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. salinityResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.