- Azadirachta indicaPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- pheromonePositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- sodium hypochloritePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- N-benzyladenineResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- charcoalResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- putrescineResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- trap barrierPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- botanicalPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- in vitroPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- insecticidePositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- irrigationPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- classPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- biocontrolResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- applicationResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- floodingResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- infectionResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- radiationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- solarizationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.