Quality: sugar starch · Phoenix dactylifera (date palm)

1. 1-naphthaleneacetic acidResults differ6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect · 3 pairs of papers confirmed to differ
2. Gibberellic acidPositive and negative results6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect
3. salicylic acidPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
4. N-benzyladeninePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
5. (2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acidResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. boron atomResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. potassium sulfateResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. calcium atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. calcium chloride dihydrateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. zinc atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. zinc sulfateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. applicationPositive and negative results20 papers: 17 positive, 3 negative or no effect
13. pollinationPositive and negative results12 papers: 7 positive, 5 negative or no effect
14. pruningPositive and negative results8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect
15. irrigationPositive and negative results4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect
16. fertilizationResults agree11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. botanicalResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. nanoparticleResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
19. nitrogenResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
20. otherResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
21. trap barrierResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
22. co2Results agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
23. coldResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
24. inoculationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.