- TrichodermaResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- selenium atomResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- sodium chlorideResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Chlorella vulgarisResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- chitosanResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- diiodineResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- etheneResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- glycineResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- iron atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- silicon dioxideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- titanium dioxideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- nanoparticleResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- in vitroResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- organicResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- potassiumResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- biocharResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- protected cultivationResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- seed treatmentResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- trap barrierResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.