Molecular: expression · Camellia sinensis (black tea)

20 questions: every treatment tested on this organism for this target by at least two papers.

  1. (+)-abscisic acidPositive and negative results7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  2. (-)-methyl jasmonatePositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  3. aluminium atomPositive and negative results5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  4. Colletotrichum camelliaePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  5. poly(ethylene glycol)Positive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  6. sodium chloridePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  7. salicylic acidResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  8. brassinolideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  9. chitosanResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  10. lightPositive and negative results9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  11. loss of functionPositive and negative results9 papers: 5 positive, 4 negative or no effect
  12. infectionPositive and negative results7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  13. inoculationPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  14. nitrogenPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  15. coldResults agree10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  16. droughtResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  17. mycorrhizaResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  18. nanoparticleResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  19. shadeResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  20. intercroppingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.