Molecular: metabolites · Camellia sinensis (black tea)

37 questions: every treatment tested on this organism for this target by at least two papers.

  1. magnesium atomPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  2. jasmonic acidPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  3. aminoguanidinePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  4. cadmium atomPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  5. putrescinePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  6. trehalosePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  7. aluminium atomResults agree12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  8. Glycine maxResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  9. melatoninResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  10. (-)-methyl jasmonateResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  11. calcium atomResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  12. 1-aminocyclopropanecarboxylic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  13. brassinolideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  14. etheneResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  15. indole-3-acetic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  16. salicylic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  17. selenium atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  18. zinc sulfateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  19. fertilizationPositive and negative results18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  20. loss of functionPositive and negative results13 papers: 4 positive, 9 negative or no effect
  21. nitrogenPositive and negative results13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  22. inoculationPositive and negative results11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  23. lightPositive and negative results11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  24. infectionPositive and negative results8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  25. phosphorusPositive and negative results6 papers: 1 positive, 5 negative or no effect
  26. droughtPositive and negative results5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect
  27. co2Positive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  28. classPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  29. coldPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  30. applicationResults agree12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  31. mycorrhizaResults agree10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  32. intercroppingResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  33. shadeResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  34. processingResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  35. heatResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  36. heavy metalResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  37. nanoparticleResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.