Pest · Camellia sinensis (black tea)

1. Azadirachta indicaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
2. Bacillus thuringiensisResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. Habrobracon hebetorResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. Metarhizium anisopliaeResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. Pseudomonas fluorescensResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. hydrogen sulfideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. profenofosResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. botanicalPositive and negative results10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect
9. fertilizationPositive and negative results5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect
10. pruningPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
11. shadePositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
12. otherPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
13. insecticideResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. trap barrierResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. applicationResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. intercroppingResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. herbicideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. infectionResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
19. inoculationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
20. lightResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.