- boron atomPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- zinc atomPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- aluminium atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- sodium hydrogensulfiteResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- lightPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- nitrogenPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- droughtResults agree4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect
- co2Results agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- fertilizationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- irrigationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- heavy metalResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- inoculationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- nanoparticleResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- phosphorusResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- shadeResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.