- aluminium atomResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- chitosanResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- magnesium atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- oligosaccharideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- shadePositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- coldPositive and negative results4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- loss of functionPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- nitrogenPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- lightPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- phosphorusPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- inoculationResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- fertilizationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- classResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- infectionResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- mycorrhizaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- phResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.