Quality: phytochemicals · Camellia sinensis (black tea)

1. salicylic acidPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. aluminium atomPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. magnesium atomResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. copper atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. lightPositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
6. nitrogenPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
7. shadePositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
8. droughtPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
9. infectionPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
10. inoculationResults agree11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. fertilizationResults agree9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. mycorrhizaResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. applicationResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. nanoparticleResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. classResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. co2Results agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. intercroppingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. loss of functionResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
19. uvResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.