Growth · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)

42 questions: every treatment tested on this organism for this target by at least two papers.

  1. zinc atomPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  2. N-benzyladeninePositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  3. zinc sulfatePositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  4. kinetinPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  5. sodium chloridePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  6. salicylic acidResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  7. (2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  8. 2,4-DResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  9. Gibberellic acidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  10. PretilachlorResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  11. Trichoderma harzianumResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  12. boron atomResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  13. GlomusResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  14. bispyribac-sodiumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  15. ethyl methanesulfonateResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  16. pendimethalinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  17. silicon atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  18. nitrogenPositive and negative results17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  19. botanicalPositive and negative results9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  20. salinityPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  21. floodingPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  22. in vitroPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  23. radiationPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  24. fertilizationResults agree40 papers: 40 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  25. applicationResults agree14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  26. nanoparticleResults agree10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  27. herbicideResults agree9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  28. inoculationResults agree9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  29. seed treatmentResults agree9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  30. droughtResults agree8 papers: 0 positive, 8 negative or no effect
  31. densityResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  32. transplantingResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  33. phosphorusResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  34. intercroppingResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  35. limeResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  36. potassiumResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  37. biocharResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  38. classResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  39. irrigationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  40. mycorrhizaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  41. otherResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  42. tillageResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.