Pyrenophora graminea · Hordeum vulgare (barley)

1. Trichoderma harzianumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
2. carboxinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. enilconazoleResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. flutriafolResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. tebuconazoleResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. thiramResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. triadimenolResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. biocontrolPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
9. pathogen productPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
10. transgenicPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
11. seed treatmentResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. sowing timeResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.