Pyrenophora teres · Hordeum vulgare (barley)

1. thiramPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. triazolesPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. Bipolaris maydisResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. Parastagonospora nodorumResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. carboxinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. epoxiconazoleResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. manebResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. propiconazoleResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. infectionPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
10. tillagePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
11. fungicideResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. seed treatmentResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. applicationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. inoculationResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
15. fireResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.