- copper atomPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- sulfur dioxidePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- surfactantPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- trifluralinPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- urea ammonium nitratePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- 2,4-DResults agree4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect
- (4-chloro-2-methylphenoxy)acetic acidResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- Triticum aestivumResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- amineResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- caffeineResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- esterResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- glyphosateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- metsulfuron methylResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- pinoxadenResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- heatPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- herbicidePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- nitrogenPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- storagePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- applicationResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- classResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- fungicideResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- phosphorusResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- seed treatmentResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.