- (+)-abscisic acidPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- Gibberellic acidPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- cadmium atomPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- zinc atomResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- melatoninResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- lightPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- salinityPositive and negative results4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- droughtPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- inoculationResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- floodingResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- herbicideResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- radiationResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- seed treatmentResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.